Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Stan in Roll Call re: PMA

“One thing I think is pretty clear is the internal deliberations about the earmarks inside the Congress, between the staff and the Member or the committee and the Member, I think are clearly protected,” said Stan Brand, a former House general counsel who is now a white-collar defense attorney.

and:

“I think the general lines would be that something done outside the legislative process, in the electoral arena, generally would not be covered: fundraisers, donations, solicitations to donors, all this stuff that would occur as a part of a campaign,” Brand explained.

“The problem here, in my mind, is what about that gets them any closer to proving anything vis-à-vis a Congressman than they already have available to them,” he added.

and

“The fact that it turns up in another place doesn’t deny it protection. You still have to go through the analysis and determine, ‘What is it?’” Brand said.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Stan on NPR re: PMA

Audio interview for Peter Overby story.
Link

Thursday, April 02, 2009

Stan on Stevens Case Dismissal

“It’s very significant,” said Stan Brand, a former counsel to the House of Representatives. “It’s obviously a very different and affirmative assertion of control over the Department of Justice and his signal that the department is going to demand higher standards.”
Link

Monday, March 30, 2009

Stan Quoted in NY Times re: PMA

“All the combustibles are here for a very salacious set of allegations that could go far beyond his campaign finance problems,” said Stanley Brand, a veteran Washington criminal defense lawyer known for representing Democrats.
Link

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Stan Quoted in American Lawyer re: Congressional Investigations

Not everyone believes in playing nice with congressional investigators.
Stanley Brand, also of Washington, D.C., and a onetime counsel to the House of Representatives under Tip O’Neill, attracts clients who are fighting multiple agencies, usually on criminal matters. He’d rather fight Congress than “roll over and submit,” as he puts it, to a grand jury, the IRS or Justice. “There are limitations on their powers, despite what they think,” says Brand.
Link

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Stan in Post re: Burris and the Senate

The evidence suggests Senator Burris lied under oath," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility. If the ethics committee finds that he lied as the Senate was deciding whether to seat him, he should be expelled "for improper conduct that reflects on the Senate," Sloan said.

Congressional ethics specialist Stanley Brand said Senate rules would permit an investigation that could lead to censure or expulsion if lawmakers decide that Burris procured the office under false pretenses.

"Having seated him under the apprehension that he was clean in respect to his relationship to the governor, I can see them taking another look," Brand said.
Link

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Stan's Speech at the 2008 Winter Meetings